What could be simpler! If this is ever something you need to do, GoLive makes it so simple you hardly even notice it, while Dreamweaver makes it a nightmare. GoLive makes it easy to upload site files without template tags or comments.Ī simple checkbox sets a preference - which can be site-specific or for all sites - to upload pages without template tags (“Adobe GoLive Elements”), comments, or even extraneous spaces (like those used to indent lines of code). Yes, it can be done, but it requires a circuitous journey of first exporting a template-free version of the site to a separate folder, and then separately uploading files from that exported version of the site to the actual web server Worse yet, the export function does not work reliably, sometimes inserting additional “notes” folders or other detritus into the exported version even when explicitly told not to do so, and sometimes exporting parts of the site that have not been modified since the last export, even when told not to do so.īy comparison, uploading without template tags or comments is a picture of simplicity with GoLive. (I cannot comment on the merits of either product for multi-user environments where different authors may be changing different parts of a site a the same time, simply because I haven’t had the opportunity to try it.) GoLive’s abilities to synchronize local and remote files, as well as basic functions like uploading modified files, work much more reliably than Dreamweaver’s (even accounting for the crashes).Īnd in terms of usability, Dreamweaver still suffers from what has become a real pet peeve of mine: an apparent inability simply to upload site files stripped of template tags or comments. Having said that, in my view, GoLive remains the vastly superior product when it comes to handling site updates performed by a single author. It was far quicker simply to SSH to the web server separately and delete or rename files from the UNIX command line. For example, my test copy of GoLive CS2 seemed pathologically prone to crashing when using the function to upload modified files to the web server, and using GoLive to accomplish simple tasks at the server end - such as deleting a couple of files - turned out to be so slow as to be nearly useless. Unfortunately, both also suffer from annoying site management bugs and shortcomings in usability.
#Adobe golive cs templates update#
Current Users of Other Site Development Environmentsīoth products offer significant improvements in terms of site management, with GoLive CS2 adding SFTP as well as FTP tunneled through SSH and over SSL, and Dreamweaver adding (at long last!) uploading of files in the background, so that updating the site no longer ties up the whole program until the update is finished.Current Users of Earlier Versions of GoLive.Current Users of Earlier Versions of Dreamweaver.Serious Developers of Large Scale Sites.The Role of Visual Editors, and the Current Leaders in the Field.
0 kommentar(er)
